| 
             Midwest Children's Cancer Center. Milwaukee Children's Hospital. 
              Milwaukee. Wisconsin. USA * 
            This Iecture is based on work performed at St. 
              Jude Children´s Research Hospital supported by National Cancer Institute 
              grants CA08480. CA07594. CI\05176 CA08151. by the American Cancer 
              Society and by ALSAC Inc work of the Midwest Children's, Cancer 
              Center is supported by National Cancer Institute grants CA 17997. 
              CA 17700. CA 17851. by the American Society, the Faye McBcath Foundation 
              and the Milwaukee Athlets against Childhood Cancer  
            Thank you for the honor of sharing in this memorial to Frederick 
              Stohlman. The work I will report today represents the efforts of 
              many physicians and scientists who have tried to understand and 
              control childhood leukemia. In North America and Europe acute lymphocytic 
              Icukcmia (ALL) represents approximately 80 percent of childhood 
              leukemia and 30 percent of childhood cancer. The disease usually 
              occurs without warning in the well child who has been well cared 
              for. It is characterized by fever, pallor, fatigue, malaise, bone 
              pain, bleeding and enlarged visccra and lymph nodes. Without effective 
              treatment the child soon dies of hemorrhage, injection or tumor 
              encroachment. The diagnosis is made by examination of aspirated 
              bone marrow. In 1948 it was demonstrated that antifolate compounds 
              produced clinical and hematological remissions in some children 
              with ALL [ 10]. However, the remissions were only partial cessation 
              of treatment was followed by relapse in a few weeks, and temporary 
              relapse usually occurred within a few months despite continued administration 
              of the drug. Subsequently , corticosteroids, mercaptopurine, vincristine 
              and occasionally cyclophosphamide were demonstrated to induce remissions 
              of a similar nature [II]. By 1961 it was possible to prolong the 
              lives of children with ALL for a year or more but mortality remained 
              near 100 percent. The major obstacles to cure were: drug resistance, 
              initial and acuired; inadequade distribution of drugs to the leptomeninges 
              resulting in primary meningeal relapse; treatment related hematosuppression, 
              immunosuppression and epithelial damage; and a pessimism about curing 
              leukemia that imprisoned the wills of many physicians [ 15, 18]. 
              The "total therapy" plan of treating ALL initiated in 1962, embodied 
              several innovative features: Combination chemotherapy for induction 
              of remission and continuation treatment; reduction of leukemia cell 
              mass to subclinical levels and restoration of hematopoiesis prior 
              to antimetabolite therapy; meningeal irradiation early in remission 
              to prevent meningeal relapse; cessation of chemotherapy after 2-3 
              years of continuous complete remission; and most important, a purpose 
              to cure rather than palliate leu kemia (Table I) [15]. Early pilot 
              studies suggested that the plan was feasible and useful [15]. Approximately 
              9/10ths of the children experienced complete remission, hematological 
              remissions were four times the usual length, and 1/6th of the children 
              remained in complete remission after treatment was stopped. However, 
              the low doses of meningeal irradiation utilized were not effective 
              in preventing meningeal relapse. In a later study the meningeal 
              irradiation was increased and limited to the cranium and upper cervical 
              area, and intrathecal methotrexate was administered during the irradiation 
              period [2]. When followed by five-drug combination chemotherapy 
              for 2 1/2 to 3 years this treatment program resulted in a low frequency 
              of meningeal relapse and 1/2 of the children are now surviving free 
              of leukemia and off treatment for many years [19]. A comparative 
              study proved that moderately high doses of preventive craniospinal 
              meningeal irradiation reduced the risk of initial meningeal relapse 
              15 fold and again led to one-half of the children surviving free 
              of leukemia when they subsequently received three years of multiple 
              drug chemotherapy [3]. At present meningeal irradiation is the only 
              method demonstrated by long-term comparative study to prevent meningeal 
              relapse both during chemotherapy and after its cessation [3.8,14.19.21]. 
              Most of the children who survive continuously free of leukemia for 
              five years and off treatment for two years are apparently cured. 
              In Fig. 1 the initial continuous complete remission duration of76 
              children entering complete remission in 1967 to 1970 are plotted 
              on a semilogarithmic graph. All of the children received 2400 rads 
              of cranial irradiation with simultaneous intrathecal methotrexate 
              or 2400 rads of craniospinal irradiation early during complete remission. 
              Subsequently they received multiple drug chemotherapy for 2lh to 
              3 years or until relapse or death during remission. As indicated. 
              the complete remission duration curve forms a plateau after 4 to 
              5 years. All children represented in the plateau have been in complete 
              remission for 8 to 10lh years and have been off treatment for 5 
              to 8 years. Except for the one child who relapsed after 5lh years 
              of complete  
               
             
            Table I. Plan of total therapy of acute 
              lymphocytic leukemia 1962- 75  
               
             
             
  
remission all children in remission at 5 years remain so. This suggests that these children are biologically different from the children in the descending portion of the curve and that this difference represents biological cure of
leukemia.
Since a plateau of continuous complete remission has been achieved the height of this plateau is now the criterion of success of curative treatment of ALL. Any new treatment or modification of treatment must be assessed with respect to this criterion. Since a plateau cannot be predicted or extrapolated statistically it is necessary to delay judgement about the curative value of treatment until actual experience demonstrates it.
The quality of survival for most children with ALL is satisfactory (Fig. 2, 3). Within a few weeks after initiation of treatment most children can return to normal activities such as school attendance and athletics [15,19,21]. Many children have 1-2 weeks of fever and somnolence approximately 6 weeks after cranial irradiation. All the children have various degrees of hematosuppression and immunosuppression, many exhibit inhibition of skeletal growth, and some demonstrate mucosal or skin disorders, elevation of hepatic enzymes in the serum, and macrocytic anemia. The children need to be monitored carefully to avoid excessive toxicity and to control infection. Trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole is effective in preventing Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in children at high risk [ 12].
After termination of chemotherapy an immunological rebound may occur with lymphocytosis of the bone marrow and rise in immunoglobulin levels [6]. Hematopoiesis recovers and elevated enzymes return to normal. Often growth and weigh1 gain are accelerated and the children have increased energy and vitality [21]. Neuropsychological studies indicate that preschool children may experience impairment of short memory and
  
 
  
            Fig.l. This semilogarithmic graph describes the initial 
            continuous complete remi5sion duration or children who began receiving 
            total therapy including preventive meningeal irradiation in 1967 to 
            1970 Treatment was stopped in all patients remaining in continuous 
            complete remis5ion after 21h to 3 years None or the children experienced 
            initial meningeal relapse after cessation or therapy and only one 
            child developed relapse after five years of complete remission The 
            level or thi5 plateau or continuous complete remission is now the 
            measure or curative value or treatment must be established by actual 
            experience for each treatment plan or its modification  
             
 
             
               
              Fig.2. Patient J.E was admitted with ALL in August 1964 
              at age 1 !72 years. He survives continuously free of Ieukemia for 
              14 years and off therapy 11 years while enjoying normal growth. 
              development and function  
             
              mathematical ability [9]. Early detection of these defects is important 
              to allow remedial measures and to minimize school difficulties. 
              Reports of abnormal computerized cranial tomography. of paraventricular 
              calcifications and of' serious functional neurological defects have 
              caused concern [13.17]. The evidence suggests that clinical meningeal 
              leukemia. high doses of' parenteral methotrexate following cranial 
              irradiation and intercurrent infectious encephalitis may be responsible 
              for many or  
               
             
             
             
               
              Fig.3. Patient F. G., age 13 years, had an initial white 
              blood cell count of 225,000 per cu mm He has developed from adolescent 
              to adult while continuously free of leukemia for 10 years. He has 
              not received treatment for eight years  
             
              these problems, Also to be considered, however, are other neurotoxic 
              drugs such as vincristine, asparaginase and prednisone, and the 
              most common cause of cerebral atrophy in young children, protein-calorie 
              malnutrition, a frequent concomitant of leukemia and its treatment. 
              The two most important reasons why children still die of ALL are 
              drug resistance, as manifest by hematological relapse during chemotherapy, 
              and failure to eradicate all leukemia, as demonstrated by hematological 
              and gonadal relapse after cessation of chemotherapy. Several approaches 
              have been taken to reduce the risk of hematological relapse. These 
              include the use of higher and more toxic dosages of drugs during 
              continuation chemotherapy, the administration of intensive chemotherapy 
              early during remission, the intermittent intensification of chemotherapy 
              by "pulses" of additional drugs, and the utilization of cell cycle 
              kinetic theory in designing drug treatment schedules [1,3,16, 19,20]. 
              So far we lack convincing evidence that any of these methods decreases 
              relapse frequency among children receiving multiple agent chemotherapy 
              after appropriate preventive meningeal treatment. Although combination 
              chemotherapy appeared to be superior to single drug treatment for 
              continuing complete remission, there remained a need to demonstrate 
              this by comparative study. It was also necessary to ascertain whether 
              addition of drugs to a two-drug combination enhanced complete remission 
              duration and the frequency of lengthy remissions. This question 
              was particularly important because the drugs used for continuation 
              chemotherapy have overlapping toxic effects on hematopoiesis, immunocompetence 
              and epithelial integrity. Administration of one of the drugs reduces 
              host tolerance to the others so that when used together their doses 
              must be lower than if they were given singly. Thus, effectiveness 
              ofone drug may be compromised by the administration of the others. 
              In a 1972-75 study (Table 2) children with ALL were randomized to 
              receive 1, 2, 3 or 4 drugs for continuation chemotherapy after remission 
              induction with prednisone, vincristine and asparaginase and preventive 
              cranial meningeal irradiation with simultaneous intrathecal methotrexate 
              [4]. Children receiving methotrexate and mercaptopurine together 
              had longer remissions and abetter chance of lengthy remission than 
              those 
            Table 2. Treatment of acute lymphocytic 
              leukemia. Study VIII 1972-75  
               
             
             
             
               
              In this comparative study remission was induced with prednisone. 
              vincristine and asparaginase and rollowed by preventive cranial 
              meningeal irradiation with sim ultaneous intrathecal methotrexate 
              Patients were assigned at random to one or fuur regimens methotrexatc 
              alonc (M). methotrexate and mcrcaptopurinc (MMp). methotrexate. 
              mercaptopurine and cyclophosphamide (MMpC). or methotrexate. mercaptopurine. 
              cyclophosphamide and arabinosyl cytosine (MMpCA) The results indicate 
              superior efficacy for the MMp combination  
                
             receiving methotrexate alone. On the other hand, patients receiving 
              cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide and arabinosyl cytosine in 
              addition to methotrexate and mercaptopurine tended to have shorter 
              remissions and fewer lengthy remissions than those in the two-drug 
              group. These results indicate that addition of simultaneous cyclophosphamide 
              or cyclophosphamide and arabinosyl cytosine did not improve the 
              efficacy of the methotrexate and mercaptopurine combination. Whether 
              a cyclic or sequential schedule of two two-drug combinations might 
              prove superior needs to be determined. The morbidity and mortality 
              of the one, three and four-drug regimens were greater than those 
              of the two-drug combination (Table 3). Children on methotrexate 
              alone received two to three times higher doses of this drug than 
              those receiving the combinations. Nine out of 20 suffered leukoencephalopathy 
              during initial complete remission while none of the other 218 children 
              developed evidence of this complication during initial remission. 
              In the three- and four-drug groups immunosuppression was more pronounced 
              and was accompanied by higher risk of varicella-Zoster infection 
              and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, more frequent hospitalizations 
              and deaths during complete remission. Thus the most efficacious 
              treatment regimen also had the least morbidity. The most significant 
              opportunity for improving the treatment of ALL in the past five 
              years has been its biological and clinical classification by immunological 
              cell surface markers (Table 4) [5,7]. This allows species identification 
              of the leukemia cells, the first step toward developing specific 
              cytocidal or cytostatic therapy. This may also provide further specific 
              biological and chemical correlates of sensitivity and resistance 
              of ALL cells to current drugs and may lead to new concepts of control 
              of ALL. For example, the relatively good prognosis of common type 
              ALL could be related to increased glucocorticoid receptors on the 
              common type leukemic Iymphoblasts [22]. Other speculations for the 
              good prognosis of common type ALL include: its origin in the bone 
              marrow where drug diffusion is probably superior than in the visceral 
              masses characteristic of thymic cell and B-cell ALL; its low mitotic 
              rate and less DNA synthesis, which might reduce the risk of mutation 
              to drug resistance; its lower number of leu - 
            Table 3. Morbidity during initial complete 
              remission Study VIII  
               
             
             
             
               
              See table 2 Iegend for explanation of abbreviations the two-drug 
              regimen was accompanied by the Ieast morbidity during initial complete 
              remission This suggests that efficacy and morbidity of a chemotherapy 
              regimen may be unrelated  
             
              kemia cells and therefore greater susceptibility to chemical eradication 
              and less possibility of a drug resistant variant; the better stimulation 
              of normal lymphocytes by common type Iymphoblasts in mixed leucocyte 
              cultures and therefore greater susceptibility to a theoretical immune 
              control. Another speculation is that common type ALL is a developmental 
              disorder of lymphocytes. Children normally experience rapid lymphocytic 
              proliferation from age two to six years, the most frequent age for 
              common type ALL. Is it possible that factors controlling lymphocytic 
              proliferation after age six years contribute to control of common 
              type ALL? Does leukemia therapy simply repress common type lymphoblast 
              replication until normal controls take over as the child becomes 
              older?  
            Table 4. Immunologic clasification. childhood 
              lymphocytic leukemia  
               
             
             
             
               
              This tentative classification of ALL is based on immunological 
              cell surface: markers of the leukemic lymphoblasts For valid determination 
              of species. Ieukemic Iymphoblasts of the bone marrow need to be 
              studied prior to chemotherapy The table was prepared by Dr. Luis 
              Borella. 
             
               
              Summary  
            ALL in children cannot be considered incurable. Approximately one-half 
              of children receiving modern therapy survive free of leukemia 5-10 
              years after cessation of treatment and at little or no risk of relapse. 
              The value of any treatment program must be measured by the proportion 
              of children surviving free of leukemia off therapy and at little 
              or no risk of relapse, that is, the proportion that is apparently 
              cured. This cannot be projected or extrapolated from preliminary 
              data. The classification of ALL into biological species by immunological 
              markers may lead to the development of more specific and effective 
              treatment as well as to better understanding of its origin and nature. 
              Most important, it must be emphasized that the majority of children 
              in the world do not benefit from advances in treatment of ALL because 
              of their complexity, hazards, expense and inaccessibility. Therapeutic 
              research needs to be directed away from more complex, expensive 
              technology such as bone marrow transplantation and sophisticated 
              radiotherapy, Effort should be concentrated on understanding the 
              fundamental biology of children's ALL and on its practical application 
              for specific, effective, simple, safe and cheap treatment. In this 
              way we can assure that all children in the world will benefit from 
              our science and we can best fulfill our obligations as 5cientists 
              and physicians.  
               
             
            References  
            I. Arlin. A. A.. et al.: Therapeutic role of cell kinetics in acute 
              leukaemia. Clin. Haematol. 7., 339-362 ( 1978)  
              2. Aur. R. J. A.. et al.: Central nervous system therapy and combination 
              chemotherapy ot~ childhood lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 37., 272~281 
              ( 1971 )  
              3. Aur. R.J.A.. et al.: A comparative study of central nervous system 
              irradiation and intensive chemotherapy early in remission or childhood 
              acute lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer 29., 381-391 (1972)  
              4. Aur. R.J.A.. et (ll.: Childhood Llcute lymphocytic leukemia Study 
              VIII. Cancer 42. 2123-2134(1978)  
              5. Belpomme. D.. et al.: Immunological diagnosis of leukLlemia and 
              lymphomLl: A World Health Organization / International Union or 
              Immunologicall Societies technical report. Br. J. Haematol.. 38,85-98 
              (1978)  
              6. Borella. L.. et al.: Immunologic rebound after cessation of long-term 
              chemotherapy in acute leukemia. Blood 40,42-51 ( 1972)  
              7. Chessells. J. M.. ct al.: Acute lymphoblastic leukacmi(l in childrcn: 
              Classitication and prog nosis. LLlncet 197711. 1307-1309  
              8. Dritschilo. A.. et LlI.: Thc role or irradiation in central nervous 
              system treatment and prophylaxis for acute lymphoblastic leukemia(;l. 
              Cancer 37.2729-2735 ( 1976)  
              9. Eiscr. C.: Intellectual abilities among survivors of childhood 
              leukemia as a function of~ CNS irradiation. Arch. Dis. Child. 53.391-395 
              ( 1978) 10. Farber. S.. et al.: Temporary remissions in acute leukemia 
              in children produced by folic acid antagonist. 4-aminopteroylglutamic 
              acid (aminopterin). N. Engl. J. Med. 238.787-793 (1948)  
              11. Farber. S.. ct al. : Advances in chemotherapy of Cancer in man. 
              Adv. Cancer Res. 4, 1-71 ( 1956 )  
              12. Hughes. W. T.. et al. : Successful chemoprophyl(;lxis for Pneumocystis 
              carinii pneumonitis. N. Engl. .J. Med. 297, 1419-1426 ( 1977)  
              13. Mclntosh. S.. et al.: Intracranial calcifications in childhood 
              leukemia. J. Pediatr. 91., 909 913 (1977)  
              14. Medical Research Council: Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: 
              Effect of "prophylactic.” therapy against central nervous system 
              Ieukemia. Br. Med. J. 2,381-384 ( 1973)  
              15. Pinkel. D.: Treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia. pp. 1-51. 
              London: Leukaemia Research Fund Publication 1973  
              16. Pinkcl. D.. et al.: Drug dosage and remission duration in childhood 
              lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer 27.247-256 (1971)  
              17. Price. R. A.. .Jamieson. P. A.: The central nervous system in 
              childhood leukcmia. II. Sub acute leukoencephalopathy. Cancer 35. 
              306-318 ( 1975 )  
              18. Price, R. A.. Johnson, W. W.: The central nervous system in 
              childhood leukemia: I. The arachnoid. Cancer 31, 520-533 ( 1973) 
               
              19. Simone. .J.: Acutc lymphocytic leukcmia in childhood. Semin. 
              in Hematol. 11.25-39 (1974)  
              20. Tatters(lll. M. H. N.. Tobias. J. S.: Are dose-response relationships 
              relevant in clinical Cancerchemotherapy? Recent advances in Cancer 
              treatment. H. J. Tagnon and M. J. Staquet (eds.). pp. 227-233. New 
              York: Raven Press 1977  
              21. Verzosa. M. S.. et al.: Five years after central nervous system 
              irradiation of children with leukemia Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Bioi. 
              Phys. 1,209-215 (1976)  
              22. Yarbro. G. S. K., et al.: Glucocorticoid receptors in subpopulations 
              of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Res. 37. 2688-2695 
              ( 1977 )  
           |