|  
             Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the 
              Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, 
              Seattle, Washington, USA  
            Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells, usually in the form 
              of marrow grafts, has been increasingly used over the last 21/2 
              decades to treat patients with various malignant and nonmalignant 
              hematological diseases. The number of transplants is steadily increasing 
              worldwide. Marrow for transplantation is usually obtained by aspiration 
              from the iliac crests. It is placed into tissue culture medium and 
              screened before infusion into the recipient. The marrow is composed 
              of a mixture of cells including large numbers of differentiated 
              and mature cells, many committed progenitors with defined function 
              and limited proliferation potential, and rare pluripotent stem cells 
              that have broad developmental and proliferative potential. The ability 
              of the pluripotent stem cells not only to self-renew, but also to 
              differentiate into the various committed hematopoietic precursors, 
              has made marrow transplantation possible. After the marrow harvest 
              and screening, the marrow is placed into a blood administration 
              bag and infused intravenously into the recipient whose underlying 
              disease has been eradicated and whose immune system suppressed by 
              high doses of chemoradiotherapy .Infused stem cells circulate through 
              the blood stream and, presumably with the help of homing receptors, 
              enter the marrow cavity , attach to the stroma bed, and begin to 
              divide under the influence of humoral and cellular stimuli. In most 
              recipients of HLA-identical sibling transplants, the cell inoculum 
              settles in uneventfully. With extraordinary speed, the progenitor 
              cells produce progeny 0 The first mature cells begin to appear in 
              the circulation within 2-3 weeks of transplantation, normal granulocyte 
              and platelet counts may be reached as early as day 40 to 50 after 
              transplant, and normal hematocrit values are seen between the second 
              and third months after transplantation. In most patients, hematopoiesis 
              is entirely of marrow donor origin, although a minority may show 
              a mixture of host and donor cells. Hematopoiesis is stable. The 
              longest survivors after marrow transplantation have passed the 25-year 
              mark, and they display a completely normal hematopoietic and immune 
              system of donor type. Recent studies using molecular probes for 
              methylation site polymorphisms on the inactivated X-chromosome have 
              shown that hematopoietic repopulation after transplantation is of 
              polyclonal origin, although one group of investigators reported 
              clonal origin in a small minority of patients (1,2). Factors governing 
              the fate of the marrow transplant include the immunosuppressive 
              effects of the conditioning programs, the degree of histoincompatibility 
              between donor and recipient, the composition of the cells in the 
              graft, and the quality of the marrow bed. Inadequacies with any 
              of these factors may lead to a problem, graft failure. With HLA-identical 
              sibling donors, most grafts are successful. Graft failure is seen 
              in less than 2% of recipients. In contrast with HLA-haploidentical 
              family members who are mismatched for 1, 2 or 3 HLA-Ioci on the 
              nonshared haplotype, graft rejection is seen in 7-20% of cases (3,4). 
              In almost 80% of patients with graft failure, residual host lymphocytes 
              could be seen in the peripheral blood, which is suggestive of host-mediated 
              immune rejection. Graft failure is accompanied by a case fatality 
              rate of 97%. Studies in a canine model of marrow transplantation 
              had predicted that engraftment problems might arise in the HLA-nonidentical 
              transplant setting (5). While grafts with marrow from DLA-identical 
              littermates were successful in 95% of the cases, transplants from 
              DLA-haploidentical littermates or DLA-nonidentical unrelated dogs 
              had graft failure rates of 92% and 95 % 0 , respectively. At the 
              time of rejection, dogs showed an increase in peripheral blood large 
              granular lymphocytes of host type which functioned as natural killer 
              cells (NK cells) (6). In coculture experiments, these recipient 
              cells suppressed marrow colony-forming unit granulocytemacrophage 
              production, not only from donor marrow but also from marrow of unrelated 
              dogs that were either phenotypically DLA-identical or DLA-nonidentical 
              with the marrow donor, consistent with the notion of cytotoxicity 
              which was not restricted by the major histocompatibility complex 
              (MHC) (Raff et al., unpublished). In agreement with the notion that 
              NK-Iike cells were involved in graft rejection was the finding that 
              agents directed against macrophages and T lymphocytes were ineffective 
              in enhancing marrow engraftmentacross MHC barriers in the dog. Accordingly, 
              we developed monoclonal antibodies (MAb) that recognized those host 
              cells which mediate rejection. To this purpose we harvested canine 
              marrow cells 6 days after TBI and immunized mice. Among the antibodies 
              produced, one, S5, had a broad hematopoietic distribution, binding 
              to normal marrow cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, granulocytes 
              and lymph node lymphocytes. The antibody was used in a controlled 
              in vivo experiment in which dogs were given 9.2 Gy of TBI followed 
              by DLA-nonidentical unrelated marrow grafts (7). In this setting, 
              graft failure was seen in 33 of 36 control dogs not given additional 
              therapy, in 6 of 7 dogs given the isotype matched irrelevant MAb 
              6.4 before TBI, and in only 4 of 19 dogs given antibody S5 at a 
              dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day from day -7 to day -2 before TBI. Thus, antibody 
              S5 resulted in a significant enhancement of engraftment over that 
              seen in control dogs given either no antibody or an isotype matched 
              irrelevant antibody. Subsequent work using techniques of sequential 
              immunoprecipitation, tryptic digestion, and N-glyconase digestion 
              revealed antibody 55 to detect the CD44 antigen (8). CD44 functions 
              in cell-cell and extracellular matrix adhesions and has been implicated 
              in lymphocyte traffic. It is also involved in T cell activation 
              via CD2 and CD3. Binding of anti-CD44 monoclonal antibodies causes 
              secretion of IL-l and TNF-alfa. Further studies using positive selection 
              have shown CD44 to be expressed on hematopoietic stem cells that 
              can repopulate dog marrow after a supralethal dose of TBI. The mechanism 
              by which an antibody to CD44 enhances engraftment across a major 
              histocompatibility barrier is as yet unexplained. Alternative modes 
              of action include that MAb 55 affects traffic of host immune cells, 
              thereby permitting marrow to home, or increases the radiosensitivity 
              of host NK cells thought to be involved in graft resistance. Elucidation 
              of these mechanisms is important for clinical application of antibody-mediated 
              enhancement of marrow grafts. Previous studies in dogs indicated 
              that hematopoietic stem cells express MHC class II molecules as 
              recognized by the anti-class II MAb 7.2 (9,10). Treatment of canine 
              marrow in vitro with antibody 7.2 and rabbit complement prevents 
              autologous marrow engraftment after lethal TBI, whereas selected 
              7.2-positive marrow cells are capable of permanently repopulating 
              the hematopoietic system of irradiated dogs. Class II molecules 
              are differentially expressed on hematopoietic progenitor cells of 
              man. Committed progenitor cells assayed as colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage, 
              mixed colonies, and burst-forming unit erythroid express HLA-DR 
              and DP antigens whereas colony-forming units erythroid are predominantly 
              HLA-DR negative. Low HLA-DR expression has been seen on murine and 
              human long-term marrow culture initiating cells. It is not clear 
              whether truly pluripotent stem cells express class II MHC antigens. 
              If present, the class II molecules on stem cells could have significant 
              clinical implications, because investigators have described a possible 
              role of HLA-D restricted cell interactions in hematopoiesis. Such 
              restrictions could be important for interactions between transplantable 
              cells and as yet undetected accessory cells in the hematopoietic 
              microenvironment. We have established a model of canine marrow autografts 
              after 9.2 ay TBI to study the role of class II antigens in hematopoietic 
              stem cell growth and differentiation (11). Twenty dogs were given 
              9.2 ay TBI marrow and intravenous murine anti-class II MAb. Infusion 
              of 0.6 mg/kg/day of antibody H81.98.21, an Iga2a MAb reactive with 
              HLA-DR, on days 0 to 4 after TBI did not prevent initial engraftment, 
              but all dogs died with late graft failure. The critical time for 
              effect of the antibody is during the first 4 days after transplant. 
              Results of extensive studies argued against several pathogenetic 
              mechanisms, including removal of antibody coated stem cells by the 
              reticuloendothelial system, canine complement-mediated cytotoxic 
              effects on stem cells, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity 
              , and inactivation of antibody coated cells by dog anti-mouse antibody. 
              To distinguish between antibody-induced damage to microenvironment/accessory 
              cells and late graft failure from lack of pluripotent stem cells, 
              three dogs were given TBI, a marrow autograft, and antibody H81.98.21 
              on days 0 to 4; one given thoracic duct lymphocytes on day 6 developed 
              graft failure; the other two given marrow depleted of accessory 
              cells by L-Ieucil L-Ieucine O-methyl ester had sustained grafts. 
              Findings support the notion that originally transplanted pluripotent 
              stem cells are no longer present on day 6 and that the marrow microenvironment 
              is functional and able to support newly injected stem cells. These 
              initial observations on the development of graft failure after injection 
              of MAb to class II during the early period after transplant suggest 
              a role for class II molecules in the engraftment and/or regulation 
              of pluripotent stem cells required for sustained marrow function. 
              The mechanism by which MAb to class II induce late marrow graft 
              failure is currently under investigation (12). Hematopoietic engraftment 
              of donor type is "permanent" in human patients as indicated by blood 
              genetic marker studies in patients, many of whom have now been followed 
              for 10-25 years after transplant. Given the permanence of the engraftment 
              and the fact that recovery in most patients is polyclonal, gene 
              transfer into hematopoietic stem cells has become an attractive 
              possibility .Gene transfer might be used to inhibit or alter genes 
              causing disease, for example, in patients with hemoglobinopathies 
              or inborn errors of metabolism, to confer drug resistance to marrow 
              cells in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy, and to transfer 
              histocompatibility genes with the aim of inducing tolerance to MHC 
              gene products. For gene therapy to be accomplished, a sample of 
              the patient's marrow would be obtained, placed into a long-term 
              culture system, and exposed to a retroviral vector containing the 
              genes of interest. In the interim, the patient would be treated 
              to eradicate the underlying disease. That accomplished, the transduced 
              marrow would be injected in hopes that genes would be expressed 
              in the progeny of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Our work was conducted 
              in a preclinical canine model using two Moloney leukemia virus based 
              vectors, LNCA and LASN, which contain both the neomycin phosphotransferase 
              gene and a human adenosine deaminase gene (13,14). The system was 
              helper virus free. Two approaches were taken. In one, prospective 
              recipient dogs were treated with canine recombinant granulocyte 
              colony-stimulating factor for 7 days. Then, marrow was harvested 
              and placed into long-term culture which was regularly fed with supernatant 
              from a virusproducing feeder layer. After the marrow was in culture 
              for 4 days, the dog was given 9.2 ay of TBI and the transduced marrow 
              infused. The dog was then treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating 
              factor until hematopoietic engraftment. The other approach involved 
              pretreatment of the recipient dog with a dose of 40 mg of cyclophosphamide 
              per kg intravenously, a maneuver which led to profound pancytopenia. 
              At the time of greatest pancytopenia, marrow was harvested and cocultivated 
              for 48 hours with a viral-producing feeder layer. Then the dog was 
              given 9.2 Gy of TBI and the marrow was infused. The dog then received 
              granulocyte colony-stimulating factor until recovery of peripheral 
              blood granulocyte counts. Six dogs were treated with long-term cultured 
              marrow. Of these six, two died with intercurrent infection, on the 
              day of TBI and marrow transplantation and on day 15, respectively, 
              while four became long-term survivors. The four are surviving between 
              2 and more than 4 years after transplant. Of the four animals treated 
              with cyclophosphamide, two died with pneumonia on days 1 and 12 
              after TBI, respectively, and two are surviving between 2 and more 
              than 4 years after transplant. At regular intervals, marrow has 
              been harvested from these dogs and placed into colony-forming unit 
              granulocytemacrophage cultures with and without the chemical G418 
              to test for neomycin resistance. For now up to more than 4 years 
              after transplant, between 1% and 10% G418-resistant colony-forming 
              units granulocytemacrophage have been found in each of the six surviving 
              animals, indicating successful gene transfer . Furthermore, peripheral 
              blood granulocytes, peripheral blood lymphocytes, lymph node lymphocytes, 
              and marrow cells have all been tested for both the presence of the 
              neomycin phosphotransferase gene and the adenosine deaminase gene 
              using a polymerase chain reaction based test. The genes were found 
              to be present for up to more than 4 years. Dogs have remained healthy. 
              Tests for helper virus have remained negative. These data indicate 
              for the first time successful and persistent transduction of long-term 
              repopulating marrow cells in a large random bred species. It is 
              clear that much work still needs to be done to increase the relatively 
              low levels of gene expression in vivo through improvements in the 
              development of both retroviral vectors and of packaging cell lines 
              so that the highest possible virus titers can be generated in the 
              absence of any detectable helper virus. Perhaps results can be improved 
              through the use of various hematopoietic growth factors. Much work 
              needs to be done in regards to developing safe conditioning programs 
              for the recipient which do not cause life threatening pancytopenias. 
              As our understanding of gene transfer techniques increases and our 
              knowledge of gene regulation in the course of differentiation improves, 
              gene transfer for the treatment of hematopoietic disorders may one 
              day become clinical reality .  
             
              ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
            This work was supported by grants HL36444, CA18221, CA31787, CA18029, 
              and CA15704 from the National Institutes of Health, DHHS.  
             
              REFERENCES  
            1. Nash R, Storb R, Neiman P. Polyclonal reconstitution of human 
              marrow after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1988;72:2031-2037. 
               
              2. Turhan AG, Humphries RK, Phillips GL, Eaves AC, Eaves CJ. Clonal 
              hematopoiesis demonstrated by X-Iinked DNA polymorphisms after allogeneic 
              bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med 1989;320: 1655-1661.  
              3. Beatty PG, Clift RA, Mickelson EM et al. Marrow transplantation 
              from related donors other than HLA-identical siblings. N Engl J 
              Med 1985;313: 765-771.  
              4. Anasetti C, Amos D, Beatty PG et al. Effect ofHLA compatibility 
              on engraftment of bone marrow transplants in patients with leukemia 
              or lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1989;320: 197-204.  
              5. Storb R, Deeg HJ. Failure of allogeneic canine marrow grafts 
              after total body irradiation: Allogeneic "resistance" vs transfusion 
              induced sensitization. Transplantation 1986;42:571-580. 
              6. Raff RF, Deeg HJ, Loughran TP,Jr. et al. Characterization of 
              host cells involved in resistance to marrow grafts in dogs transplanted 
              from unrelated DLA-nonidentical donors. Blood 1986;68:861-868.  
              7. Schuening F, Storb R, Goehle Set al. Facilitation of engraftment 
              ofDLA-nonidentical marrow by treatment of recipients with monoclonal 
              antibody directed against marrow cells surviving radiation. Transplantation 
              1987;44:607-613.  
              8. Sandmaier BM, Storb R, Appelbaum FR et al. An antibody that facilitates 
              hematopoietic engraftment recognizes CD44. Blood 1990;76:630-635. 
               
              9. Szer J, Deeg HJ, Appelbaum FR, Storb R. Failure of autologous 
              marrow reconstitution after cytolytic treatment of marrow with anti-Ia 
              monoclonal antibody. Blood 1985;65:819-822.  
              10. Schuening F, Storb R, Goehle Set al. Canine pluripotent hemopoietic 
              stem cells and cFu-GM express la-Iike antigens as recognized by 
              two different class-II specific monoclonal antibodies. Blood 1987;69:165-172. 
              11. areinix HT, Ladiges WC, Graham TC et al. Late failure of autologous 
              marrow grafts in lethally irradiated dogs given anti-class-1I monoclonal 
              antibody. Blood 1991;78:2131-2138.  
              12. areinix HT, Storb R, Bartelmez SH. Specific growth inhibition 
              of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells mediated through monoclonal 
              antibody binding to major histocompatibility class II molecules. 
              Blood 1992;80:1950-1956.  
              13. Schuening Fa, Storb R, Stead RB et al. Improved retroviral transfer 
              of genes into canine hematopoietic progenitor cells kept in long-term 
              marrow culture. Blood 1989;74:152-155. 
              14. Schuening Fa, Kawahara K, Miller DA et al. Retrovirus-mediated 
              gene transduction into long-term repopulating marrow cells of dogs. 
              Blood 1991;78:2568-2576.  
           |